Time Course of Coagulopathy Evaluated with Rotational Thromboelastometry in Patients with Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Objectives Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reportedly causes thromboembolic complications due to coagulopathy with hypercoagulability and a hypofibrinolytic state. We evaluated the time-course of coagulopathy in patients with severe COVID-19 from admission to discharge from our intensive-care unit (ICU). Methods We conducted a retrospective study of adults with severe COVID-19 admitted to our ICU between January 20, 2021, and March 31, 2022. We obtained clinical information, laboratory data, and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters at admission and discharge. Results Fifteen patients were included. Fibrinogen and D-dimer values did not change significantly but were above the normal ranges at admission and discharge. Regarding ROTEM parameters, the maximum clot firmness in fibrinogen function (FIBTEM), a marker of hypercoagulability, did not change significantly but was above the normal range at admission and discharge [median (interquartile range), admission vs. discharge: 31 (25-34) mm vs. 31 (27-32) mm, p=0.589]. The maximum lysis at 60 minutes in the extrinsic coagulation pathway (EXTEM) and intrinsic coagulation pathway (INTEM), as markers of the fibrinolytic function, were both significantly lower at discharge than at admission [median (interquartile range), admission vs. discharge: EXTEM, 3 (2-4) vs. 1 (0-2), p=0.011; INTEM, 3 (1-6) vs. 1 (0-2), p=0.008]. Conclusion This study revealed a persistent hypercoagulable state at ICU discharge and a worse hypofibrinolytic state at discharge than at admission. These results may contribute to a better understanding of coagulopathies in the acute to subacute phases of severe COVID-19.

Influence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the incidence of heat stroke and heat exhaustion in Japan: a nationwide observational study based on the Heatstroke STUDY 2019 (without COVID-19) and 2020 (with COVID-19).

AIM: To assess heat stroke and heat exhaustion occurrence and response during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, registry-based study describes and compares the characteristics of patients between the months of July and September in 2019 and 2020. Factors affecting heat stroke and heat exhaustion were statistically analyzed. Cramér's V was calculated to determine the effect size for group comparisons. We also investigated the prevalence of mask wearing and details of different cooling methods. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between 2019 and 2020. In both years, in-hospital mortality rates just exceeded 8%. Individuals >65 years old comprised 50% of cases and non-exertional onset (office work and everyday life) comprised 60%-70%, respectively. The recommendations from the Working Group on Heat Stroke Medicine given during the coronavirus disease pandemic in 2019 had a significant impact on the choice of cooling methods. The percentage of cases, for which intravascular temperature management was performed and cooling blankets were used increased, whereas the percentage of cases in which evaporative plus convective cooling was performed decreased. A total of 49 cases of heat stroke in mask wearing were reported. CONCLUSION: Epidemiological assessments of heat stroke and heat exhaustion did not reveal significant changes between 2019 and 2020. The findings suggest that awareness campaigns regarding heat stroke prevention among the elderly in daily life should be continued in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. In the future, it is also necessary to validate the recommendations of the Working Group on Heatstroke Medicine.